![]() ![]() GitLab’s continuous integration (CI) capabilities automate the testing and delivery of your code, which means you can get more done and spend less time waiting for tests to pass. GitLab includes lots of features in its DVCS, including an integrated project wiki and a dedicated project website. Bitbucket deploys in the cloud, on a local server, or your company’s data center, depending on your security needs. Features include pull requests, code branches, and in-line commenting for discussions. As part of the Atlassian software family, Bitbucket lets you integrate your other Atlassian products like Jira, Bamboo, and HipChat, and communicates well with all of these. You can connect up to five users to the platform for free, which is great if you want to try it out before you purchase. Bitbucketīitbucket is a fan favorite on Quora and Reddit. Whatever your needs, you’ll find the best-fit Github alternatives right here. You have an overwhelming aversion to the Octocat.You work in a version control language other than Git.You have a large team, and GitHub’s pricing doesn’t fit.Your team needs the security and privacy of an in-house system.Some reasons for looking at GitHub alternatives include: There are plenty of GitHub alternatives if you’re looking for distributed version control software (DVCS). ĪLSO READ: 4 JIRA Alternatives for Your Dev Team In fact, GitHub holds spot 38 on Moz’s Top 500 Sites list. Despite the availability of other version control languages like Mercurial (Hg) and Subversion (SVN), the proliferation of Git continues, largely due to evangelistic GitHub users and the company’s own branding efforts. I guess their authors think it's more efficient to do everyday simple things on the command line and they have based their clients on that inefficient workflow.According to a 2016 GitLab survey, 98 percent of developers use open source tools, and 92 percent of developers prefer Git as their version control language. I am disappointed by the type of **** made to pass as a git client. This could easily compete with GitEye and SmartGit. Its still in its development phases (1.5.1 is still missing HiDPI support), but gets basic work done. current branch clearly visible while committing each changed/added file can be committed separately ![]() ~ super clear list of changed/added files (list + diff detail) + refresh shortcut īeautiful clear history, commit UX messy, lightweight, custom commands can be added + full history visible in main window current branch clearly visible while commiting ~ each changed/added file can be commited separately current branch clearly visible in history beautiful tree (DAG), branches CLEARLY separated committing unclear, history hidden, requires a license ~ full history visible in main window 2nd place: SmartGitīeautiful integrated file diff. Note: if the Git Files view stops working on you, then use the similar Git Staging view. + current branch clearly visible while commiting + each changed/added file can be committed separately + super clear list of changed/added files (list + diff detail) + current branch clearly visible in history + beautiful tree (DAG), branches CLEARLY separated Most intuitive UI, fastest workflow, highly customizable ~ full history visible in main window ~ = feature somewhat matches my requirements Legend - = feature missing or so **** it doesn't count Most of the tested git GUI clients are complete ****, below are 2 of the best and 1 that is not as **** as others.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |